Time to support Israel

Well, once again, Israel gets kicked in the balls by a terrorist group, and still some world leaders are condemning Israel for trying to protect itself from these cowards. We all know that Hezbollah, Hamas, and Islamic Jihad cannot be trusted to leave Israel alone. Memebers of Hezbollah sneak over the Israeli border, kill eight soldiers, and kidnap two more, and Israel is supposed to just sit back, and let it happen with retaliating?? That is out and out bull**!!!!

     Israel now should go on the offensive, and stay on the offensive until their soldiers are returned safely home. Israel has caved into pressure, and given up the Gaza strip, part of the west bank, turned over hundreds of prisioners, and basically gave away the kitchen sink. What have the terrorists given up?? NOTHING!!! Not one damn thing.

Now, the world must side with Israel at this trying time in their history. When you are surrounded by enemies on all sides, enemies who would like to see you wiped off the face of the earth, it's time to take a stand. The terrorists now must face a choice, recognize Israel's right to exist, ot have your money and aid cut off. First off, Russia must pressure Iran to stop aiding Hezbollah and Hamas. Lebanon must reign in Hezbollah leaders, Syria must stop aiding and abetting them as well. The US and George Bush also have a pivitol role to play here as well.

      Israel is in the right here. They have been stepped on over and over again. This cannot continue or Israel will have to take more drastic measures. The state of Israel must exist, and must have help doing so. To do any less is just not acceptable.



Display:


Support me (3.00 / 1)

There's an incredibly bratty kid who lives next door to me.  He regularly throws rocks at my dog, vandalizes my mailbox, makes prank calls, etc.  I've tried and tried to get him to stop, complained to his parents to no avail.  I hope you'll all stand with me in the step I plan to take next--I'm going to shoot the kid, and I've rented a bulldozer to destroy his house.

Israel's response is out of all proportion to the attacks of Hamas and Hezbollah and is not going to accomplish its stated goal of acquiring the return of the prisoners.  How is killing hundreds of Lebanese civilians a fair response to the killing of 7 Israeli soldiers and the kidnap of 2?  Israel has blockaded Lebanon by air and sea so its citizens cannot flee despite the fact that Israel is raining bombs onto Beirut.  Is this fair?

If Israel were really interested in obtaining the return of its soldiers, it would seek a peace settlement with Hezbollah in good faith.  I am NOT defending the actions of Hezbollah or Hamas or anyone else.  But if Israel wants peace, then it, as a democratic nation and not a militant band of fundamentalist criminals, has the responsibility to take the first step towards peace, and must not react to Hezbollah's provocations with the same malice that motivated Hezbollah's attack.


"I do not support Roe versus Wade. It should be overturned."--John McCain
by lorax on Fri Jul 14, 2006 at 11:43:40 PM EST

Ridiculous analogy (3.00 / 1)

Hezbollah, a tool of Iran, wants to destroy Israel.  To say why doesn't Israel seek a peace agreement with Hezbollah is like saying why doesn't the US just seek a peace agreement with Isama bin Laden -- THEY DON'T WANT PEACE!

Israel has shown in its history that if they can be assured of peace they will do a lot.  They gave up the entire Sinai for peace with Egypt.  They made concessions for peace with Jordan.  But somehow they are wrong for not acquiescing to a terrorist org.

A better analogy would be, say you were a country and a terrorist organization on your northern border occassionally shot rockets at your northern villages and finally they kill 7 of your soldiers and kidnap 2 of your soldiers.  There is then a real concern they will be transferred to an even more dangerous place.  Would you just say, Oh well, that's too bad, or would you try everything to get your citizens back by targeting strategic points to attempt to prevent the transport of those soldiers.

Well we know what you would do instead -- sign a friggin peace treaty! It is tragic that there are civilians being killed but that is in part due to the symbiotic relationship between the Lebanese government and Hezbollah -- something they won't address.

It is one thing to be on the left, and another to blame those defending themselves from terrorism.


by Ian in DC on Sat Jul 15, 2006 at 12:56:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ridiculous analogy (3.00 / 1)

Yes, no matter how many Lebanese civilians must die, Israel must be willing to pay any price for the return of its two soldiers.  Even if Israel has to kill every last fucking Lebanese person, it's worth it.

Doesn't that sound ridiculous?  It would be as if after 9/11 we had fired nukes at Kabul and Kandahar.  That is a response that would have been ineffective, disproportionate, and immoral, just like Israel's response today.  Israel would have a better chance at securing the return of its soldiers if it did not invade Lebanon and bomb Beirut.  As of right now, it is hard to foresee a situation in which Israel could achieve the return of those two soldiers alive.


"I do not support Roe versus Wade. It should be overturned."--John McCain
by lorax on Sat Jul 15, 2006 at 08:50:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ridiculous analogy (none / 0)

Except that isn't in any way Israel's strategy.  They have specifically targeted strategic areas and Hezbollah.  If they wanted to kill a lot of people to achieve their goals, they certainly could -- but they don't.


by Ian in DC on Sat Jul 15, 2006 at 09:10:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ridiculous analogy (3.00 / 1)

From BBC News:

On Saturday, Lebanon's Prime Minister Fouad Siniora had made an emotional appeal for a UN-supervised ceasefire to end Israeli raids that have killed more than 80 Lebanese....

Associated Press news agency said Israel had bombed the Jiyeh power station south of Beirut and that firefighters did not have enough water to douse the flames.

Al-Manar TV said Israeli air-to-ground and gunboat shells had hit a bridge on the road from Beirut to the airport.

Residential areas in the Haret Hreik and Bir al-Abed districts had also come under attack, the TV said....

And 18 Lebanese civilians, including women and children, were killed on the coastal road to the southern city of Tyre when their vehicles were struck by missiles as they fled a village.


"I do not support Roe versus Wade. It should be overturned."--John McCain
by lorax on Sun Jul 16, 2006 at 02:35:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Support me (3.00 / 2)

"There's an incredibly bratty kid who lives next door to me.  He regularly throws rocks at my dog, vandalizes my mailbox, makes prank calls, etc.  I've tried and tried to get him to stop, complained to his parents to no avail.  I hope you'll all stand with me in the step I plan to take next--I'm going to shoot the kid, and I've rented a bulldozer to destroy his house."

There you go. :-)

If Mexico were firing missiles at Texas and kidnapping border guards, I suspect we would not be so "understanding" as many here about Israel.

I take no comfort whatever in anyway partially agreeing with this liebermanlives provocateur but I believe there is an element of antisemitism in much of the liberal condemnation of Israel for defending itself against terrorism.  No American should overlook the fact that "Little Satan" is a proxy for "Big Satan" and that Israel is the poor relative that is punished in our stead by fundamentalist fanatics.

This is not meant in any way to support some gross atrocities and mistreatment of Arabs by Israel.  The problems with a theocracy are all too apparent in the formation and existence of Israel but let's try to be reasonable shall we?  


by terryhallinan on Sat Jul 15, 2006 at 02:13:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Support me (3.00 / 1)

"If Mexico were firing missiles at Texas and kidnapping border guards" then we would have a right to pursue war against Mexico.  However, if a Mexican drug cartel were firing missiles at Texas and kidnapping border guards, we woulnd not have the right to destroy Mexico City's airport, invade Mexico, impose a naval blockade on all of Mexico's coasts, destroy Mexico's road to Guatemala, and kill hundreds of Mexican civilians, when we could have instead sought more limited remedies against the cartel itself.  It would not be necessary for us to exact punishment upon the entire population of Mexico.


"I do not support Roe versus Wade. It should be overturned."--John McCain
by lorax on Sat Jul 15, 2006 at 08:45:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Can't escape bad PR (3.00 / 1)

When you are 6 foot tall and a 4 year old kicks you in the balls, what is the right response?   Pound the 4 yr. old and his brothers ...  and sisters ... and his aunts and uncles and cousins?

Israel can't escape the bad PR.  

They are holding more Arabs than the terrorists are holding Israeli soldiers.   Only one side has modern fighter / strike aircraft.   Only one side has tanks.

I support Israel's efforts to root out terrorism 100%.   But I expect them to do it with some brains.   We didn't level Tim McVeighs hometown.  


by dpANDREWS on Fri Jul 14, 2006 at 11:45:39 PM EST

Population (none / 0)

NationMaster
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/peo_po p-people-population

#98          Hong Kong          6,899,000

#101        Israel                  6,277,000


by blues on Sat Jul 15, 2006 at 01:03:19 AM EST

Re: Time to support Israel (3.00 / 1)

US has its own problems. Let Israel deal with its own. We have helped Israel enough. If you want, you and other neocons can volunteer in Israel instead of getting our troops to die for you.


by Pravin on Sat Jul 15, 2006 at 02:03:50 AM EST

Re: Time to support Israel (none / 0)

"US has its own problems. Let Israel deal with its own."

That is what Bush is saying to New York.


by terryhallinan on Sat Jul 15, 2006 at 02:16:37 AM EST

Re: Time to support Israel (none / 0)

I am supporting Israel, but people are trying to confuse the war with Lebanon with the war in Iraq, like Nick Culvuto. These wars are different, Israel was attacked and we weren't attacked by Iraq, and that's why I am going to support them.


by olawakandi on Sat Jul 15, 2006 at 06:37:54 AM EST

Re: Time to support Israel (3.00 / 1)

There is an element of truth to both sides of this story.    True, Jews around the world have been persecuted for centuries, and Israel has a right to some Peace for it's people, but I for one, am tired of being an American who must turn their head and not look too deeply into Israeli bulldozers razing houses and areas of Palestine.  Who have to wonder WHY are we sending billions of dollars to Israel every year?   Surely they are able to support themselves?     Is it to provide them with the best weapons money can buy?    

The EU and every other country is condemning Israel's actions in Lebanon.   Why is the US the only country saying it's ok?    Something does not sit right with me about why Israel has become such an aggressor.    Someone above said the other middle east countries do not want peace, that is why they fight.     I find that hard to believe that a man will willingly give up his children's lives so easily, because they do not want peace.   It is time for Israel to show they are willing to meet half way.  That they will put their bulldozers away.   They will put their weapons down and try for peace over and over until it sticks.  A little humbleness would not hurt.


by Bergs on Sat Jul 15, 2006 at 08:55:25 AM EST

Define 'support' (3.00 / 1)

First put me marginally in the disproportionate camp. Quite aside from the millions of Lebanese at risk, Israel has cut off an estimated 25,000 Americans from escape.

Lebanon accepted Hezbollah into government, let their armed wing remain armed and effectively turned over South Lebanon to them. While collective punishment is a war crime, openly harboring an armed group that has attacked a neighboring country will ultimately prove that actions have consequences. Perhaps the Lebanese government did not believe they had the power to send government troops to the border, perhaps they had reason to believe that Syria would not allow that to happen. Well powerless or not they allowed a Party in Government to mount an armed attack on a neighboring state, and they are suffering some consequences.

But to return to the question. What 'support' are we supposed to be giving here? Because this worries me: "The US and George Bush also have a pivitol role to play here as well."

The hell we do, and certainly George should stay right out of this.  The very last thing this situation needs is a heaping helping of his bluster and bullshit. Beyond vetoing any UN Resolution that would impose an arms embargo (not that the US would pay attention anyway), the right thing for the US to do is to sit back and let the IDF and Hezbollah settle this one and just prary Syria doesn't send tanks across the border. (Although I think they Israelis could handle the Syrians)


PollKatz: Bush Approval in 15 polls
by Bruce Webb on Sat Jul 15, 2006 at 10:07:54 AM EST

Re: Time to support Israel (3.00 / 1)

Dor NeoCons and NeoDems one military disaster in Iraq just isn't enough.

But hey! If you screw up one war, just start another!

Closer to home....one thing's for sure. Wider war in the ME is going to be even worse for Lieberman's dying political career.


With Democrats Lieberman goes for the jugular. With Republicans he goes for the lips.
by Sitkah on Sat Jul 15, 2006 at 01:54:34 PM EST

Re: Time to support Israel (3.00 / 1)

George thinks war is like grammar, in the way that double negatives in a sentence cancel each other out to produce a positive.  So if you have a second war it cancels out the negative effects of the first one and produces a positive.

He learned this from Mommy Bar during one of her drunken afternoons around the pool at the Club. "Life is just like grammar," she said before completing her thought and passing out.  And George took it to heart.


You're nobody...until you've been banned at dkos because you had an original thought or spoke truth to power.
by NorCalJim on Sat Jul 15, 2006 at 11:21:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Time to support Israel (none / 0)

It is one thing to go into Southern Lebabon.

But why Beirut?  Lebanon's democracy is still very young, and it is just now emerging from the the dominance of Syria (and Syria's influence hasn't gone away yet)


by v2aggie2 on Sat Jul 15, 2006 at 02:06:31 PM EST

Re: Time to support Israel - NOT (2.50 / 2)

It's time to do a reality check.  What should Israelis realistically expect from Islam while it steals, destroys and squats illegally on the property and terrtitory of an Islamic people?  Should it expect them to throw cream pies? or bombs?  It is rediculous to even consider support for Isreael.  It's all one big land grab, rolling out decade after decade.  They grab as much as they can and when the world can no longer tolerate it, they roll back an inch, only to roll miles forward a year later.

We believe that government authority is founded on the consent of the governed, and that doesn't include planted colonists.  Israel should not just repair to within its borders, it should shrink those borders until there is not one town or village being forced against its will to be a part of Israel.

If Israel cannot take the shelling etc., it should give back what it has stolen over the last 65 years.  There is not a dime's worth of difference between the Islamic terrorists of today and the Isreaeli terrorists of old.

If they refuse, an American administration should cancel its weapons Loan program and withdraw or destroy any tanks or jets or Isreaeli forces outside of its borders or on or under the sea.

And someday that is what its going to come down to because the threat to peace by Israel is intolerable.

Sorry to my Israeli supporting friends but this is just too much.


You're nobody...until you've been banned at dkos because you had an original thought or spoke truth to power.
by NorCalJim on Sat Jul 15, 2006 at 07:06:24 PM EST

Re: Time to support Israel (3.00 / 1)

"What should Israelis realistically expect from Islam while it steals, destroys and squats illegally on the property and terrtitory of an Islamic people?"

Right on, brother.

Long past time too Americans returned its lands to Native Americans and went away.

But hey, didn't Jews inhabit the Middle East for millenia before there were Muslims?  


by terryhallinan on Sat Jul 15, 2006 at 07:47:28 PM EST

Re: Time to support Israel (2.50 / 2)

Yes.  And then they left.  


You're nobody...until you've been banned at dkos because you had an original thought or spoke truth to power.
by NorCalJim on Sat Jul 15, 2006 at 11:23:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Time to support Israel (3.00 / 1)

No "the Jews" didn't leave.

An oppressed people may not matter much but the Jews have maintained a presence in the Middle East for a very long time though many have moved because of pogroms like a certain one in Europe.

When do you think Americans will finally leave America to the Native Americans?  By the way there is a drive to remove from America hispanics that are the descendents of Native Americans.  They are called "illegals" of all things.

Got any Holocaust jokes?  They would be appreciated by the fine leader of Iran.


by terryhallinan on Sun Jul 16, 2006 at 04:45:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Time to support Israel (2.00 / 1)

That's a pretty nasty tirade.  Got any facts and logic, anything besides slurs and straw men?

The facts are that Israel has conducted itself in such a reprehensible fashion that it has not, and will not, ever, become the safe haven everyone envisioned for it.  It has not undertaken to make itself an asset to the people of the region rather than a curse, now a curse to the entire world.  The world cannot afford an Israel as presently constituted, a rogue state, a failed state.  On its present course, Israel must content itself with being attacked, more or less eternally because it can never be stopped.  It's just going to have to write it off as a cost of doing business as a brutal colonial overlord.  The lesson over and over and over again is that colonialism doesn't work.  And there is no getting around that inconvenient reality.


You're nobody...until you've been banned at dkos because you had an original thought or spoke truth to power.
by NorCalJim on Sun Jul 16, 2006 at 10:40:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.